🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.